Nerman Fatic vs Michael Vrbensky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs M. Vrbensky

Nerman Fatic

BIH

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'7" (170 cm)

225

C. Rank

588

191

Best Rank

277

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$3.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Michael Vrbensky

CZE

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'7" (170 cm)

225

C. Rank

588

191

Best Rank

277

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$3.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Vrbensky

They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 1 and Michael Vrbensky winning 2. The last match between Michael Vrbensky and Nerman Fatic was at the Austria F3 (Wels), 21-07-2018, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Michael Vrbensky getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	0
Vrbensky	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(F) Austria F3 (Wels)(07-21-18)

Stats

Michael Vrbensky

Nerman Fatic

N. Fatic vs M. Vrbensky H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	M. Vrbensky
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$3,200
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	59.43% (312-213)
0	Clay	1
12	Titles	11
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs M. Vrbensky Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 45.47% of points on their second serve, while Michael Vrbensky has won 41.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michael Vrbensky has won 47.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.11% and 27.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michael Vrbensky has saved 55.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Michael Vrbensky winning 46.55% (W/L 27/31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Michael Vrbensky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 224/141), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 41/36).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Michael Vrbensky has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.24% of matches (W/L 19/23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 0 times and Michael Vrbensky being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 1 and Michael Vrbensky winning 2.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Michael Vrbensky was at the Austria F3 (Wels), 21-07-2018, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Michael Vrbensky getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:1:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.83 while Michael Vrbensky has played against players with an average rank of 419.36.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michael Vrbensky has won 18% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michael Vrbensky has converted 40.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Michael Vrbensky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs M. Vrbensky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	M. Vrbensky
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
14	Games Won	17
5	Aces (Total)	4
6	Total Double Faults	6
3:1:0	Average Match Time	3:1:0
73% (80/110)	1st Serve %	62% (77/124)
55% (44/80)	1st Serve Win %	62% (48/77)
53% (16/30)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (21/47)
23% (5/22)	Break Pts Won %	39% (7/18)
44% (55/124)	Return Points Win %	45% (50/110)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Vrbensky Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Yokohama Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Yasutaka UchiyamaY. Uchiyama	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
R1 Woobin ShinW. Shin	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q3 Thijmen LoofT. Loof	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Ramkumar RamanathanR. Ramanathan	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
Q1 Kasidit SamrejK. Samrej	L	6-0 2-6 7-6(4)	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs M. Vrbensky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	M. Vrbensky
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	59.43% (312/213)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	57.26% (686/512)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	52.54% (5976/5398)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	57.58% (38/28)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	61.37% (224/141)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.19% (50/44)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.31
1598	Aces Total	1716
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.31
1517	Total Double Faults	1729
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1st Match
509.47	Average Opponent Rank	499.46
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	56% (19604/35276)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	69% (13603/19604)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (7805/15671)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	45% (1599/3577)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	41% (14407/35059)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (2/2)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	47.74% (95/104)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	66.77% (215/107)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (303/511)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (84/149)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (89/158)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (312/271)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (312/41)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (213/40)